Scan pictures fuzzily, allowing you to find pictures that are similar,ĭupeGuru is customizable. Tags and shows music-specific information in the duplicate resultsĭupeGuru is good with pictures. It has a special Music mode that can scan That are the same, but it also finds similar filenames.ĭupeGuru is good with music. Find your duplicate files in minutes, thanks to dupeGuru runs on Mac OS X and Linux.ĭupeGuru is efficient. Matching algorithm that can find duplicate filenames even when theyĪre not exactly the same. On Linux & Windows, it’s written in Python and uses Qt5.ĭupeGuru is a tool to find duplicate files on your computer. On OS X, the UI layer is written in Objective-C and The peculiarity of using multiple GUI toolkits, all using the sameĬore Python code. I also assume that NCW probably stuck to some standard ways of formatting the output, so it may not be needed at all.DupeGuru is a cross-platform (Linux, OS X, Windows) GUI tool to findĭuplicate files in a system. The worst case might be you have to re-format the output a litte to make the input acceptable for the other problem, but that's a fairly small problem. That might be preferable to spending a lot of time making a fully custom script. Getting a script to read through that shouldn't be too hardĪnd chances are you can probably find a fully featured commanline deduping tool that you can pipe that output to directly if you look around a bit. Yes - you could either extract it from the json or just something like That's why rclone dedupe is pretty limited in what it does - it only fixes the spesific types of issues that can happen on cloud drives. Fixing these problems is what rclone deupe is for. Most operating systems can not allow this or understand how to display it, so it's confusing to rclone how to handle these cases. The thing is that rclone's dedupe is not really meant for "traditional" file-organizing reduplication but rather as a tool to handle the fact that some Cloud-drives (like Google Drive) allows and sometimes accidentally creates identical copies of files. Yes, sorry - I think rclone's automatic fixes only work on duplicate folders and filenames with same name and same hash. I assume you are talking about files that have identical hashes and names? At least that's how I remember it working last time I used such software (sorry, can't remember a spesific name). i think the latter is usually more common - but even though it requires some interaction it's at least pretty fast as you probably just get them side-by-side visually and click a button to decide. To be sure (and not just rely on size and date) it would have to actually download the file (for any size that is identical) and either do some analysis on the picture - or prompt the user. The downside is it would be slower if you have a ton of pictures because it wouldn't have access to hashes via the mount. This would have the benefit of being a ready-made solution that could work through a normal mount. I'm sure there exist several good free programs for this. If you are not up to scripting anything then my last suggestion would be trying to find some photo-deduping software. But then if you are willing to make that in the first place - why not just make a pull request and implement it directly into rclone? Anyone is free to make code suggestions Meanwhile - it should be possible with some fairly basic scripting to output a list with hashes and dates from rclone, and then sort and delete with the external script. You'd have to make a feature request (or upvote an existing one if you found that). I don't think dedupe can currently do what you ask. For that reason it should not be a default behavior because it's not very "safe".īut specifically for photos and the like it would be ideal - I agree with that. Blindly removing the oldest of the two could make for example a program stop working when you download it again because some support file is missing (that some other program also used), and trying to figure out what happened could be annoying to say the least. It's not actually that unusual that an identical file exists in more than one place. You could automate what you ask for, but it would have to be used with caution. Files in the same place with identical hashes can be handled automatically, while identical names with differing hashes usually requires some user input as the "correct answer" is not always obvious. As far as I know, dedupe only works on identical files or duplicates.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |